Privacy On Forums And The Web

I've been wandering around the internet since Netscape and Internet Explorer first appeared. I've seen it grow and change. Lately it has changed again with the dramatic increase of activity by multitudes of people posting overwhelming volumes of their most intimate personal details on places like MySpace, Facebook, Twitter and the constantly expanding range of other social net-working sites.

That trend is now reaching older sites such as the diabetes web forums I have been reading and posting on for a few years. The ADA Forum was re-vamped last November to add social networking and dLife added it a couple of years earlier.

I'm continually fascinated that people who would not tell their most intimate personal secrets to their own family, and certainly not to those who may not be their friends, happily post everything from their sex lives to their bathroom problems on the web. It becomes patently clear that the vast majority are blissfully unaware that not only can almost all of their writing be seen by anyone who cares to but it is being stored for readers decades from now. Many also appear to believe that forums and sites which require registration can only be seen or used by those who are registered.

Some years ago, when I only posted on usenet's alt.support.diabetes and misc.health.diabetes groups I googled my sig "Alan, T2, Australia" and was quite surprised to find that my posts were appearing on over 40 different forums; everything from bicycling to low-carbing. Some of those forums required registration - but my posts still appeared.

For one example of many, I am not a member of MedKB: http://www.medkb.com/Uwe/Forum.aspx/dia ... k-Diabetes

These days I also write on several other forums and my blog. I just googled that sig again and got 237,000 responses. Now, I know I write too much - but not THAT much!

Registration may help - but that depends on the software of the web-site and the integrity of the web-master or group owner. Try an experiment yourself. If you are a member of a group or forum that you need to register for, select a unique part of one of your old messages, place it in quotes and google or bing for it. You may get a rude surprise.

Even if your message does not appear in that sort of simple search, remember that any-one can register on ANY forum and "mine" the forum until the moderator or web-master ejects them. That includes anyone who may have a grudge against you or may be looking for information about you. To be honest, the only thing protecting the vast majority of the personal information posted on the web's social networking sites is the fact that 99.99% of it is utterly and incredibly boring to anyone but the writer.

Long ago I made the decision that I would never write anything on the net or web that I would be embarrassed to find was read by my mother, my wife, my children or my grand-children. Those are the important ones; I couldn't care less what the rest of the world thinks of me. Although I do keep in mind things like copyright law and that not all readers may have my best interests in mind.

I write on the assumption that there is NO privacy on the web regardless of the site I write on. Always write with that in mind and you will make the web a much safer place for yourself.

Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter

I'm Type 2! What Should I Eat?

I often see these questions, in one form or another, on the various diabetes forums I read:

"How many carbs can I eat in a day?" or "What ratio of fat to carbs to protein should I eat?".

I think that is the wrong way to approach the subject for us as individual type 2 diabetics. Very few of us will actually sit down and work out the calories and fat:carbohydrates:protein ratios we are eating on a daily basis, nor does a daily limit for carbs work very well when our response to those carbs may be quite different at different times of day.

I do not deliberately plan to consume any particular proportion of daily fats, protein and carbs, nor any set daily carbohydrates level or limit. Instead, when I slowly developed my present way of eating I followed a simple process to work out what suited me.

My logic is fairly basic. I need to get all the appropriate nutrients for good health, but I need to get them in a way that does not jeopardise any of my various afflictions, including diabetes. I learned very soon after diagnosis that eating excessive carbohydrates caused blood glucose spikes, so I used this technique to adjust my carbohydrate levels until that did not happen: Test, Review, Adjust.

But other people, including my doctor, were then concerned that I may be missing out on vital nutrients. So I used a diet analyser to check what I actually ate to see if that was true. This is the most recent analyser I have found for that purpose: CRON-o-meter; there are others on the web if you do some searching. I also have regular blood tests; those can also show if I am deficient in various vitamins and minerals. If analysis or blood tests showed that I was missing something I then used the USDA nutrients guide to see what foods I could use to include those missing nutrients without increasing blood glucose levels.

In general terms, I found that eating a variety of proteins such as meat, fish and eggs in normal serve sizes, and replacing most of my starchy carbs, such as breads, potatoes, corn, pasta and similar with a wide range of colourful vegetables, such as cabbage, spinach, celery, onions, peppers, cauliflower, egg-plant and similar meant that there were very few nutrients I missed out on. In fact the increased variety of foods, especially vegetables, in my diet improved my nutrient intake in several areas.

If, and only if, I could not obtain a nutrient by adding a food to the menu I then added a supplement. At the moment my only supplements are vit D3, fish oil and magnesium.

When I do take the trouble to work out my fat:carbohydrates:protein ratios I find they are usually surprisingly close to those suggested in these interesting papers by researchers Mary C Gannon and Frank Q Nuttal:

Effect of a High-Protein, Low-Carbohydrate Diet on Blood Glucose Control in People With Type 2 Diabetes

Control of blood glucose in type 2 diabetes without weight loss by modification of diet composition

I did not use those as a guide, but it is reassuring to see that there is some science supporting my present way of eating.

Cheers, Alan

Everything in Moderation - Except laughter

Serendipitous Cajun Chicken

Last night I had some chicken pieces to cook but I didn't feel like baking them, so I made the following up as I went along. I'm not sure this could really be called a recipe because the quantities and directions are not exactly quantified or normal, but the result was delicious.

I started with a chicken maryland (drumstick and thigh) and two wings. I jointed all those and ended up with eight small bits of chook, to be cooked for two.

I browned all those in a wok in a decent splash of peanut oil. When they were browned but not fully cooked I removed them to be returned later.

I sliced or chopped one red onion, a stalk of celery and a medium carrot and sautéed those in the chicken-flavoured oil; adding a minced clove of garlic when they were nearly cooked. Then I added a half teaspoon of cayenne, a half-teaspoon of turmeric, a half-teaspoon of paprika, a half-teaspoon of salt and a grating of pepper. The measurements were by calibrated eyeball. I also added just a few flakes of my ultra-hot dried birds-eye chili from the garden and some dried oregano, also from my garden.

I returned the chicken to the veges in the wok, gave it a good stir, then covered it all with chicken stock. I brought that to the boil and then reduced it to simmer and went off to upload some movies to my travel blog. That turned out to be an essential and serendipitous part of the cooking technique.

The up-loading took a little longer than I expected. Some time later (probably about a half-hour) I returned to find the wok had boiled almost dry and the veges on the bottom were starting to stick to the pan and going rather black. On tasting, the flavour had developed a slightly charred characteristic (hence the cajun tag) but still seemed edible.

I added a little water and gave it a good stir to de-glaze the wok and to mix the black flecks into the mass of veges; just enough water to result in a nice gravy consistency. I did not use any thickener in the recipe; no flour or guar gum. Then I returned it to the simmer for about ten minutes; this time under supervision.

I served it with some trepidation. The tasting judge, my better half, thought it was wonderful. She claimed it was the best chicken she had eaten for a long time. Surprisingly, so did I. Of course, she may have just been trying to ensure that the cook continues to cook for her...

I'm not quite sure how to write that down as a recipe technique: "cook until just charred but not burnt".

I haven't worked out a nutrition count but the only significant carbs would have been the carrot. It hardly caused a blip on my peak post-meal BGs.

Bon appetit,

Alan

Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter