Saturday, October 31, 2009

Cholesterol, Fats, Carbs, Statins and Exercise


The following random thoughts are just that - my thoughts, not facts. However, I have provided some selected cites for most of them. If you think I have been a little selective, I agree - I'm human and will spin things my way. So I've also given links to some medical search engines at the foot if you would like to do some further reading. Just one rule: papers funded by pharmaceutical companies, especially statin manufacturers, or written by authors with links to those companies have little credibility with me.

The cites are only representative of a lot of general reading. There are many more supporting papers out there. I am happy to hear from anyone with more specific papers on particular aspects - pro or con.

These thoughts are based on my own reading from many various sources over time. Lately I have found them reinforced in Taubes' book "Good Calories, Bad Calories", but most I had read before that from other sources.

1. Eating excessive carbohydrates leads to high triglycerides. The definition of "excessive" may depend on whether or not the diner has diabetes. Triglycerides are one of the three major reported components of the usual lipids panel, the other two being HDL and LDL. One that we should get but often don't is VLDL, the dangerous one; usually that is estimated by dividing the triglycerides by 5 (in mg/dl). But that estimate is very approximate.

2. LDL is considered by the mainstream medical establishment to be the bad cholesterol and most anti-cholesterol meds target that. But high triglycerides, high VLDL and low HDL are actually the ones we should be most concerned about.


3. The absolute number of our LDL is less important than the specific number of certain components of LDL; the dangerous ones are the small, dense particles. High triglycerides usually indicate high proportions of those small dense particles. Better indicators of our lipids health are VLDL and the apolipoproteins A1 and B.

4. ALL of the foods we eat affect our cholesterol levels. EXCESS of carbohydrates OR fats may lead to dyslipidemia.

5. The past research on the relationship between cholesterol and heart disease is misleading at best. There appears to be shaky support for the hypothesis that lowering cholesterol, particularly LDL, improves overall mortality and even less support for the use of statins to do that.

6. Inadequate dietary fat will lead to low HDL.

7. Exercise usually, but not always, helps increase HDL.

8. A low HDL is a better indicator of future cardiac problems than high LDL and apolipoprotein levels are a better predictor than either.

9. Diabetics should aim for a triglycerides to HDL ratio of less than 3.0 in mg/dl or 1.3 in mmol/l.

10. Cholesterol in the foods we eat such as eggs and seafood has an insignificant effect on the cholesterol in our blood stream.

11. Low LDL is also dangerous and can be related to other problems such as Parkinson's Disease, cancer and other causes of early death.

12. There is growing concern that the over-prescription of statins and limited but alarming research into their side effects needs a lot more investigation.

Putting that all together, I no longer worry about the level of fats in my diet for their affect on cholesterol. I am selective in my choices of oils, but for other reasons such as Omega 3 content or eliminating trans-fats. I also found that reducing carbohydrates reduced my triglycerides as well as my blood glucose levels. I also dropped my statin, lipitor, four years ago.

When you look back through that list, some things stand out to me. If I am going to worry about cholesterol at all, the two things that will improve it most are moderating carbohydrates for better triglycerides and increasing exercise for better HDL. It seems a happy coincidence that those are the same two things that improve my blood glucose levels most. Additionally, inclusion of some additional fats in my menu to replace those carbohydrates may also help increase HDL.

For those interested in further reading to support - or refute - my thoughts here are a few useful search engines: Google Advanced Scholar, Medline and Highwire.

Cheers, Alan

Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.

Footnote:

Here are some additional references for you in no particular order. Most of these papers and articles apply to more than one of the points above, which is why I found it awkward to include them in the body. The titles tend to give the context.

Effects of a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet on VLDL-triglyceride assembly, production, and clearance

Effect of Dietary Carbohydrate on Triglyceride Metabolism in Humans

Effects of a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet on VLDL-triglyceride assembly, production, and clearance

Increased consumption of refined carbohydrates and the epidemic of type 2 diabetes in the United States: an ecologic assessmentEffect of the Magnitude of Lipid Lowering on Risk of Elevated Liver Enzymes, Rhabdomyolysis, and Cancer

Exercise Prevents the Accumulation of Triglyceride-Rich Lipoproteins and Their Remnants Seen When Changing to a High-Carbohydrate Diet

Effects of Protein, Monounsaturated Fat, and Carbohydrate Intake on Blood Pressure and Serum Lipids

Carbohydrate-Induced Hypertriglyceridemia: An Insight into the Link between Plasma Insulin and Triglyceride Concentrations

A Low-Carbohydrate, Ketogenic Diet versus a Low-Fat Diet To Treat Obesity and Hyperlipidemia

Plasma high density lipoproteins HDL2, HDL3 and postheparin plasma lipases in relation to parameters of physical fitness.

8 comments:

trinkwasser said...

Very timely! I just wrote a post on Ronald Krauss

http://trinkwasser.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/small-dense-krauss-revisited/

which not only covers a load of his papers but links back to some important posts by Peter on Hyperlipid.

What I haven't yet decided is whether the lipids themselves are actually causal of anything or whether the dyslipidemia is simply an indicator of metabolic processes run amok which are also the cause of the cardiovascular disease - for example the trigs/HDL ratio is not only well correlated with c/v disease as well as LDL particle size but also with insulin resistance. It's been hypothesised that this ratio is also an indicator of grain consumption.

I'm largely with you - dropping the carbs has radically reduced my trigs, adding more saturated fats has brought my HDL right up and looking at BG and BP as well this has fixed the metabolic problem. However I tried dropping my statin and my LDL shot up, and my trigs increased more than I was expecting, so in my case 10mg simvastatin seems worthwhile. What is NOT worthwhile is using the statin to moderate the end result of a crap diet - which is how they are normally used - this doesn't affect the rest of the metabolic processes which are complex way beyond the soundbytes found on certain "medical" sites.

Bob Fenton said...

Alan, Very good thoughts! You might be interested in a post by David Mendosa at http://www.healthcentral.com/diabetes/c/17/91258/plac-test
This may answer some questions.
Bob

Jerry NYC said...

A great post Alan.
I was diagnosed T2 last April. After years of Lipitor and an extreme low-fat diet to control my bad lipid numbers-with only limited success-I went low-carb. And added moderate fats (including formerly forbidden cheese!). 6 months later I've lost 33 lbs, triglycerides dropped from 238 to 44. HDL increased from 34 to 77. And my BG hugely improved without meds.
Thanks to your comments along with many others I've found a new way of living.

EllieOops said...

I have read your article and it concurrs w/some papers I've read. Back in the late '70, I used a handbook titled, "Martinis and Whip Cream" which listed many foods w/their "carbocal" contents and I was actually able to lose 30 lbs. in a few months (along w/bicyling) by eating many foods and not exceeding the total amts of carbocals allowed a day.... I hope I am going in the right direction.. I'm please w/the fact that you provide info that I can build on...if that makes sense...take care, and thank you...

Anonymous said...

Hey are you a professional journalist? This article is very well written, as compared to most other blogs i saw today….
anyhow thanks for the good read!

James Reno said...

Wow, what great information. I have actually had the good fortune of getting off my daily meds recently and getting my fasting blood glucose down to almost normal through raw food and daily exercise. I am sure the info on your blog will help others, as I am trying to do as well.

To Your Health!
James Reno (editor)
Raw-Food-Repair.com

Alan said...

James, thanks for the comment.

I reject a dozen comments a day from those attempting to use this blog to advertise their own web-sites. I know that was the real reason for your post here. However, I allowed yours because I also wanted to mention that I do NOT believe there is any additional benefit in a raw food diet over any other dietary fad.

I notice you have CLL/SLL; I also have CLL. Unlike you I make no claims that my way of eating has led to my CLL remaining dormant for the past 7 years. Of course, I believe it has helped me but my haemotologists consider it serendipitous. Click on "Other's Stories" and then "Turning Points" for a longer story. I wish you the very best in your battle with that affliction. Note the link on the side-bar to the Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ACOR Email List; you might also find http://www.cllforum.com/ valuable.

Although I eat a lot of salads I still cook the vast majority of my foods. My ancestors were also omnivores, like me, and I'm sure they preferred their meat or even, sometimes, their vegetables barbecued.

Anonymous said...


Iam glad to be a visitor of this sodding site !Thankyou for this rare information!.